2008-7-7

23:20 axiak
jacobkm: good job
23:20 axiak needs to shower
23:22 cramm
guys, what about #7638
23:22 DjangoBot
23:22 jacobkm
cramm: thanks for the heads-up; I'll add the "+" and close the ticket.
23:24 Gulopine edits conflicts
23:40 axiak
jacobkm: you still around?
23:41 jacobkm
axiak: yup
23:41 jacobkm
what'd I break?
23:41 jacobkm
:P
23:41 axiak
:)
23:41 axiak
no there's another bug I'm not sure you're aware of
23:41 axiak looks for the ticket number
23:43 axiak
ah, #7635
23:43 DjangoBot
23:44 axiak
so.
23:44 axiak
the fix on there isn't a real fix
23:44 axiak
fdr wants to work on the real fix, but it's a bit harder :)
23:44 jacobkm
Ha, man, I knew that thing there was trouble :)
23:44 axiak
:-)
23:44 axiak
yeah.
23:45 axiak
anyway, that counter *should* net to 0 over the post data
23:45 axiak
(i.e. increment and decrement an equal amount each part)
23:45 axiak
but there seems to be a leak, and it's net incrementing 1 per part
23:45 axiak
so if you have, say, 815 parts in an edit-inline form, whoops :)
23:45 jacobkm
yeah, just increasing the limit is not OK
23:45 axiak
yeah
23:46 jacobkm
I'm *definitely* gonna have to leave that up to you and/or fdr, though -- I understand the general gist of the parser, but not enough about it to really tackle this myself yet.
23:46 axiak
yeah, I'm just mentioning it because we're not out of the woods yet
23:47 axiak
we should be able to figure out something by tomorrow
23:47 axiak
fortunately it doesn't end up being an API change :-)
23:47 jacobkm
It's to be expected with something big like this; we'll probably be tracking this stuff down for some time now.
23:47 axiak
yeah
23:47 jacobkm
Yeah, I think (hope!) the API changes are over.
23:52 Gulopine
until i get mine ready :)
23:52 axiak
haha :)
23:53 Gulopine
i don't have to change any of your stuff though
23:56 jacobkm
OK, I'm out.
Page 3 of 3   ← Previous  (238 total)