2008-7-15
| 03:11 | Alex_Gaynor_ | Ok, works for me |
| 03:11 | Gulopine | thanks |
| 07:58 | telenieko | morning all, since when do we have a CLA? |
| 08:08 | mattmcc | ? |
| 08:13 | telenieko | on the donations page there's a link to a CLS |
| 08:13 | telenieko | CLA |
| 08:13 | telenieko | I suppose jacob is about to announce it ;) |
| 08:39 | uzi | Backing it up with a link: |
| 08:39 | uzi | |
| 12:51 | zerok | does the cla@ email address already work? |
| 14:13 | zerok | jacobkm, hi :-) quick question: does the cla@ email address already work? |
| 14:13 | jacobkm | zerok: yup |
| 14:14 | zerok | jacobkm, ok, tnx :-) just wanted to make sure my mail didn't reach the end of the internet before getting sucked into a black hole or something :-) |
| 14:14 | jacobkm | zerok: nope, I've got it right here -- thanks :) |
| 14:15 | zerok | np :-) |
| 14:16 | zerok | imo everyone signing that should receive a t-shirt :-P |
| 14:17 | jacobkm | zerok: we have over 300 contributors -- that's a lot of t-shirts to send out! |
| 14:18 | zerok | ;-) |
| 14:18 | jacobkm | zerok: How's aobut instead everyone who signs gets a free web framework? |
| 14:18 | jacobkm | <grin> |
| 14:18 | zerok | "and in green" <3 |
| 14:19 | zerok should use the <just-kidding> tag more often when writing stuff on irc, so that he isn't misunderstood :-) | |
| 14:21 | jacobkm | No, I got you totally; still, it would really be awesome to be able to send thank-you gifts to all our contributors |
| 14:21 | zerok | sure, but everyone should be happy enough with having done something for the project and therefor made other people's life much easier :-) |
| 14:22 | jacobkm | Yup |
| 14:22 | david`bgk | jacobkm, we'd got a discussion on #django-fr about the scope of the cla, what about people who translate the documentation? |
| 14:23 | david`bgk | in other words, is it restricted to AUTHORS file? |
| 14:23 | jacobkm | david`bgk: no, we need to get CLAs from everyone who's contributed more than like a typo fix, so definitely translators. |
| 14:24 | jacobkm | We'll be doing a more formal call for CLAs like this week or next -- we need to audit the SVN history and gather a list of everyone we need CLAs from. |
| 14:24 | jacobkm | But of course anyone who wants to help us get started quickly can start doing 'em now. |
| 14:25 | david`bgk | translators of django internal and/or translators of the documentation? because we translated a lot of the documentation: http://www.django-fr.org/documentation/ |
| 14:26 | jacobkm | david`bgk: so since that documentation hasn't yet made it back into Django (which is mostly my fault... sorry!) you don't need a CLA for it -- we only need CLAs to cover work that we're (i.e. the foundation) distributing. |
| 14:26 | david`bgk | ok thanks, that's clear now :) |
| 14:27 | jacobkm | Cool - thanks |
| 14:27 | jacobkm | This is one of those annoying legal things... I really wish we could just write code and not have to worry about sily stuff like this :) |
| 14:27 | zerok | but basically everonye on a localized-docs-project who doesn't sign the cla will hold back the project from inclusion in the core distribution, right? |
| 14:29 | jacobkm | Yeah, going forward basically any checkin to Django will need to be covered -- you don't need new documents for each contribution, though, so as long as all the authors of whatever's going in (code, docs, whatever) have clas on file, that's fine. |
| 14:29 | zerok | in this case .... /me goes slapping some people around in #django-de :P |
| 14:31 | cramm | david`bgk: Hi. Sorry for bothering you again with this issue (the test suite failure when trsting loading of templates from eggs). I've pasted here http://dpaste.com/65101/ a standalone version of the code with some debugginf output and a more granular implementation, would you be so kind to execute it and dpaste back the output? |
| 14:33 | david`bgk | cramm, sure |
| 14:36 | david`bgk | cramm, here is the result: http://dpaste.com/65102/ |
| 14:37 | zerok | whome should i nudge for some triage on a localflavor addition ticket? |
| 14:38 | cramm | david`bgk: Thanks!. So, the script isn't failing. Now I'm really at lost why the test (that does the same thing) fails :( |
| 14:38 | cramm | *at loss |
| 14:48 | lsoto | re #7560, the current patch is failing a test now |
| 14:48 | DjangoBot | |
| 14:48 | lsoto | django/db/models/fields/__init__.py", line 456, in get_db_prep_lookup |
| 14:48 | lsoto | value = [int(v) for v in value] |
| 14:48 | lsoto | TypeError: 'Query' object is not iterable |
| 14:48 | lsoto | so, looks like the value parameter to get_db_prep_lookup can also be a Query object |
| 14:50 | telenieko | hi jacobkm: you got my CLA also? |
| 14:50 | jacobkm | telenieko: indeed |
| 14:50 | lsoto | then, should every get_db_prep_lookup method check for that case as the base Field.get_db_prep_lookup does? |
| 14:50 | telenieko | fine ;) |
| 14:50 | lsoto | |
| 14:51 | lsoto | to me, that would look like a lot of code repetition |
| 14:52 | david`bgk | cramm, can I help you more? |
| 14:53 | cramm | david`bgk: hrm, so you can confirm the test is still failing? (you can run it with runtsts.py templates) |
| 14:53 | lsoto | hmm, should I come back after 1.0alpha with this backend-related issues? |
| 14:54 | lsoto | looks like the focus is not there now (quite reasonable btw) |
| 14:54 | david`bgk | cramm, yes even with os.path.normpath patch |
| 14:55 | cramm | david`bgk: there have been reports from other OS X users here for which the test don't fail |
| 14:59 | cramm | david`bgk: oly think I can think of is inserting some debugging print's in django/template/loaders/eggs.py and re-run the Django tests |
| 15:00 | cramm | david`bgk: maybe commenting the except+pass at lines 22 and 23 |
| 15:04 | david`bgk | cramm, it doesn't raise any error if I comment those lines and just return (resource_string... |
| 15:06 | cramm | david`bgk: wird because the test is failing by the raise at line 24, isn't it? |
| 15:09 | david`bgk | omg, it works. I'm so sorry :/ |
| 15:10 | david`bgk | just a moment I verify |
| 15:13 | david`bgk | yes it works even without os.path.normpath |
| 15:14 | david`bgk | I imported my "clean" version of django after import django.contrib as contrib in runtests so it wasn't used :( |
| 15:17 | david`bgk | what about this line in runtests in order to avoid my mistake: sys.path = [os.path.join(os.getcwd(), '../')] + sys.path ? |
| 15:18 | david`bgk | this way you are sure that you test your current django |
| 15:39 | dwsBeta2 | sanity check: is the current test count ~363? |
| 15:40 | dwsBeta2 | i'm prepping for the sprint, and want to avoid a late discovery that my environment is messed up. |
| 15:41 | Alex_Gaynor | buildbot says 367 |
| 15:41 | dwsBeta2 | thanks |
| 15:41 | Alex_Gaynor | I'm guessing your SVN rev is out of date |
| 15:42 | dwsBeta2 | it was. running tests again now. |
| 16:27 | cramm | david`bgk: (sorry, had to rush to a meeting I had forgot about), so it leavs us just with the problem under win32 :-). Thank you very much for your patience! |
| 16:33 | david`bgk | cramm, well I'm a bit confused, I hope you hadn't spent too much time on the osx issue :/ |
| 16:45 | david`bgk | cramm, what do you think of my proposition about sys.path? |
| 16:49 | david`bgk | on another topic, it seems that the documentation build with sphinx is no longer possible: http://dpaste.com/65137/ |
| 18:04 | cramm | david`bgk: sounds like a good idea, but I don't have enough understanding of the etstin infastrecture. Maybe freakboy3742 could give a more useful and authoritative opinion? |
| 18:50 | neoj | Rakennamme mielell� r��ydyn sivuston k�t� ty�uja jotka mahdollistavat tuomaan esiin sivun keskeinen asia, kuvagallerian. |
| 18:50 | neoj | sorry |
| 19:05 | RaceCondition | where's the block template tag defined in Django source? |
| 19:05 | RaceCondition | I'd like to implement an appendblock tag to be able to append to a block multiple times in a single template |
| 19:05 | RaceCondition | or blockappend |
| 19:16 | RaceCondition | found it |
| 19:19 | cramm | RaceCondition: seems to be in django/template/loader_tags.py:do_block() |
| 19:19 | cramm | oops :) |
| 19:20 | RaceCondition | parser.__loaded_blocks is an array.. hmm. wouldn't a hash/set be faster? |
Page 2 of 2
← Previous
(192 total)